Use when building a source-cited property and debt schedule from user-provided facts and documents for a family law matter, for attorney review.
When to use
A family law matter needs an organized, source-cited schedule of assets and debts for an attorney.
Statements, deeds, account records, and loan documents must be assembled into one schedule.
An attorney needs a property/debt schedule before disclosure, negotiation, or settlement review.
Required inputs
The document set — bank and investment statements, deeds and title documents, retirement-account records, business records, loan and credit-card statements, tax records, and financial disclosures — with source references.
The asset and debt facts the user states, including any user-provided values and balances — or not provided.
Title, ownership, and (if the user provides it) disputed/undisputed status for each item — otherwise not provided.
Any reimbursement or credit claims the user wishes to record (as stated, not assessed) — or not provided.
The parties, their roles, the matter type, and the jurisdiction — or not provided, jurisdiction flagged [verify jurisdiction].
If the document set, the parties, or the jurisdiction is missing, record it as not provided and return the missing-information list first. Build the schedule only from provided facts and documents.
Use when gathering the facts relevant to a child support review into a structured intake table, missing-documents list, and questions for counsel — without calculating support.
When to use
A child support review is starting and the relevant facts must be organized for an attorney.
Income, cost, and parenting-time facts must be captured in a structured intake before counsel applies the governing guideline.
An attorney needs a missing-documents list before a support analysis.
Required inputs
The jurisdiction and governing law — or not provided, flagged [verify jurisdiction].
The children (ages and roles as stated, with identifiers masked) — or not provided.
The custody and parenting-time facts as the user states them — or not provided.
Income facts as the user supplies them for each party (amounts, sources, and frequency as stated) — or not provided.
Healthcare costs, childcare costs, and any special or extraordinary expenses the user states — or not provided.
Existing support orders, any arrears the user states, and the financial disclosures exchanged — or not provided.
The parties and their roles, and the case stage — or not provided.
Source references to any disclosures, pay records, statements, or orders provided.
If the jurisdiction, the children, or the parties is missing, record it as not provided and return the missing-information list first.
Use when building a source-cited chronology of parenting and caregiving facts for a custody or parenting dispute, for attorney review.
When to use
A custody or parenting dispute needs an organized, sourced timeline of caregiving and parenting facts.
Communications, records, and incident notes must be ordered by date before substantive review.
An attorney needs a chronology of exchanges, missed visits, school/medical involvement, or relocation facts.
Required inputs
The document set — communications and messages, school and medical records, incident notes, police reports if provided, calendars and parenting schedules, and existing orders — with source references.
The parties, their roles, and the children involved (ages and roles as stated, with identifiers masked) — or not provided.
Any existing custody, parenting, or protective orders — or not provided.
The jurisdiction and the case stage — or not provided, jurisdiction flagged [verify jurisdiction].
For each event, whether the user states it is disputed or undisputed — otherwise not provided.
Any dates the user supplies, echoed verbatim and marked [deadline verification required].
If the document set, the parties, or the children involved is missing, record it as not provided and return the missing-information list first. Build the chronology only from provided documents.
Use when reviewing an existing or proposed custody or parenting order for clarity and administration issues, producing an order-clarity checklist and ambiguity table for attorney review.
When to use
An existing or proposed custody or parenting order must be checked for clarity and administrability.
An attorney wants the ambiguities, gaps, and enforcement-friction points in an order surfaced.
A proposed order must be reviewed for missing administration details before it is finalized.
Required inputs
The full existing or proposed custody or parenting order text (uploaded or pasted). Do not review from a description alone.
The parties, their roles, the children involved, and whether the order is existing or proposed — or not provided.
The jurisdiction and governing law — or not provided, flagged [verify jurisdiction].
The case stage and the purpose of the review (clarity check, modification preparation, enforcement preparation, or other) — or not provided.
Any related orders or agreements the user provides, with source references — or not provided.
If the order text, the parties, or the children involved is missing, record it as not provided and request it before proceeding. Do not reconstruct or assume order language.
Use when organizing the facts of a divorce or dissolution matter into a structured facts table, missing-documents list, and issue map for attorney review.
When to use
A divorce or dissolution matter must be organized into a structured fact set for an attorney.
An attorney needs a divorce facts table and a missing-documents list before drafting or a client meeting.
Scattered divorce facts need a category-by-category organization before substantive review.
Required inputs
The parties and their roles — or not provided.
The marriage date and the separation date if the user provides them, echoed verbatim and marked [deadline verification required]; otherwise not provided.
Whether children are involved, and their ages and roles as stated — or not provided.
Income, assets, debts, business interests, real estate, and retirement-account facts as the user states them — or not provided.
Support issues (child and spousal) and custody/parenting issues as stated — or not provided.
Existing agreements or orders, financial disclosures exchanged, and the contested/uncontested posture — or not provided.
The jurisdiction and governing law — or not provided, flagged [verify jurisdiction].
Source references to any disclosures, statements, agreements, or records provided.
If the parties, the jurisdiction, or the posture is missing, record it as not provided and return the missing-information list first.
Use when organizing facts and referral/escalation considerations for a domestic violence or abuse-related concern in a family law matter, for attorney review — without creating a safety plan.
When to use
A user raises a domestic violence, abuse, or safety concern within a family law matter.
Facts and records around a safety concern must be organized and the right referrals identified for an attorney.
A family law matter needs the safety dimension flagged and routed before other work proceeds.
Required inputs
The immediate safety concerns the user describes — or not provided.
Any existing protective or restraining orders (type and date as stated, date marked [deadline verification required]) — or not provided.
The incidents the user chooses to describe, and any police reports, medical records, messages, or photos provided, with source references — or not provided.
Whether children are involved, and any housing or financial access concerns — or not provided.
Upcoming court dates the user supplies, echoed verbatim and marked [deadline verification required] — or not provided.
The parties, their roles, and the jurisdiction — or not provided, jurisdiction flagged [verify jurisdiction].
The user is never required to describe more than they wish. Record only what the user volunteers; never press for traumatic detail.
Use when organizing family-law discovery requests, responses, disclosures, subpoenas, authorizations, deficiencies, and meet-and-confer items into a tracker for attorney review.
When to use
A family law matter's discovery must be tracked across requests, responses, and disclosures.
An attorney needs a status view of discovery, identified deficiencies, and meet-and-confer items.
Subpoenas, authorizations, and disclosure exchanges need an organized log.
Required inputs
The discovery set — propounded and received requests (interrogatories, document requests, admissions), responses, financial disclosure forms, subpoenas, and authorizations — with source references.
The response status for each item as the user states it (served, responded, outstanding, partial, objected) — or not provided.
The responsible party for each item, and any deficiencies the user identifies — or not provided.
Any deadlines the user supplies, echoed verbatim and marked [deadline verification required] — or not provided.
The parties, their roles, the case stage, and the jurisdiction — or not provided, jurisdiction flagged [verify jurisdiction].
If the discovery set, the parties, or the jurisdiction is missing, record it as not provided and return the missing-information list first.
Use when building a hearing-preparation checklist for a family law hearing — pleadings, declarations, exhibits, disclosures, witnesses, and open questions — for attorney review.
When to use
A family law hearing is approaching and the preparation tasks must be organized into a checklist for an attorney.
An attorney needs a status view of the pleadings, declarations, exhibits, disclosures, and witnesses for a hearing.
Open questions for counsel must be collected before a hearing.
Required inputs
The hearing type and the issues to be heard as the user states them — or not provided.
The pleadings, declarations, exhibits, financial disclosures, and prior orders available, with source references — or not provided.
The witness list, the service and proof-of-service documents, and the requested relief as the user supplies it — or not provided.
Any deadlines the user supplies, echoed verbatim and marked [deadline verification required] — or not provided.
The parties, their roles, the case stage, and the jurisdiction — or not provided, jurisdiction flagged [verify jurisdiction].
If the hearing type, the issues to be heard, or the parties is missing, record it as not provided and return the missing-information list first.
Use when opening a new family law matter and you need a structured intake summary, issue map, missing-facts list, document request list, and safety/escalation flags for attorney review.
When to use
A new family law matter must be captured in a structured, reviewable form for an attorney.
A user describes a divorce, custody, support, or property dispute and a first-pass organization of the facts and issues is needed.
An attorney wants an issue map and a document request list before a client meeting.
Required inputs
The parties and their roles (for example, the user's client and the other party) — or not provided.
The relationship or marriage status, and the matter type (divorce/dissolution, custody/parenting, support, property/debt, modification, enforcement, or other) — or not provided.
The case stage (pre-filing, filed, pending, post-judgment, modification, appeal, or other) — or not provided.
The jurisdiction and governing law — or not provided, flagged [verify jurisdiction].
Whether children are involved, and any existing orders (custody, support, protective, or other) — or not provided.
The financial, property/debt, support, custody/parenting, and safety concerns the user wishes to raise — or not provided.
Source references to any pleadings, orders, correspondence, or records provided.
Any dates the user supplies, echoed verbatim and marked [deadline verification required].
If the parties, the matter type, the case stage, or the jurisdiction is missing, record it as not provided and return the missing-information list first. Do not assume a default.
Use when organizing the facts relevant to a parenting schedule discussion into a facts table, conflict/ambiguity list, and logistics checklist for attorney review.
When to use
A parenting schedule is being discussed and the relevant facts need an organized, reviewable layout.
A current schedule and a proposed schedule must be set side by side so an attorney can see the differences.
The practical logistics of a parenting arrangement need a checklist before negotiation or a hearing.
Required inputs
The current parenting schedule as the user describes it — or not provided.
Any proposed parenting schedule — or not provided.
School, daycare, transportation, holiday, vacation, distance, and work-schedule facts as the user states them — or not provided.
Any child needs the user wishes to record (stated as facts, not assessed) — or not provided.
The communication method between the parties, exchange logistics, and any existing custody or parenting orders — or not provided.
The parties, their roles, the children involved, and the jurisdiction — or not provided, jurisdiction flagged [verify jurisdiction].
Source references to any calendars, schedules, orders, or correspondence provided.
If the current schedule, the parties, or the children involved is missing, record it as not provided and return the missing-information list first.
Use when reviewing a marital settlement, parenting, support, or custody-stipulation agreement to produce a key-terms table, issue list, ambiguity list, and missing-provisions list for attorney review.
When to use
A marital settlement, parenting, support, or custody-stipulation agreement or draft needs an organized review for an attorney.
An attorney wants the key terms, issues, ambiguities, and missing provisions surfaced before a client discussion or negotiation.
A settlement draft must be checked for internal consistency and gaps.
Required inputs
The full agreement or draft text (uploaded or pasted). Do not review from a description alone.
The parties, their roles, and the matter type (divorce/dissolution, custody/parenting, support, or other) — or not provided.
The jurisdiction and governing law — or not provided, flagged [verify jurisdiction].
The case stage (negotiation, pre-signing, pre-approval, post-judgment modification, or other) — or not provided.
Any related orders or prior agreements the user provides, with source references — or not provided.
If the agreement text, the parties, or the matter type is missing, record it as not provided and request it before proceeding. Do not reconstruct or assume agreement language.
Use when gathering the facts relevant to a spousal support or alimony review into a structured intake table, missing-documents list, and questions for counsel — without calculating support.
When to use
A spousal support or alimony review is starting and the relevant facts must be organized for an attorney.
Income, expense, employment, and standard-of-living facts must be captured in a structured intake before counsel applies the governing law.
An attorney needs a missing-documents list before a support analysis.
Required inputs
The jurisdiction and governing law — or not provided, flagged [verify jurisdiction].
The relationship or marriage duration if the user provides it (marriage and separation dates echoed verbatim and marked [deadline verification required]) — otherwise not provided.
Income, expenses, and employment facts for each party as the user states them — or not provided.
Health facts and standard-of-living facts if the user wishes to record them (stated as facts, not assessed) — or not provided.
Assets and debts as the user states them, and existing support orders — or not provided.
The financial disclosures exchanged, the parties and their roles, and the case stage — or not provided.
Source references to any disclosures, pay records, statements, or orders provided.
If the jurisdiction or the parties is missing, record it as not provided and return the missing-information list first.